The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The provided line graph gives information about the deviation amount of meals consumed by Australian youngsters from 1975 to 2000. Overall, teenagers who bought pizza and hamburgers increased throughout the period, while fish and chips had ups and downs.
For pizza consumption, starting from the beginning to 10 years after, it had rocketed from under 20 to around 80. Ensuingly, the growth began to increase until the end of the period that landed up only slightly more than a hundred. Not only pizza but also hamburgers which had soared halfway the years from almost 40 to about 80. The hamburgers’ expansion leisurely went up at the early and in winding up, the number remained stable surpassing 80. On the other hand, fish and chips accretion oscillated at the outset from 100 to nearly 80, thence rose to approach 100 again. Nonetheless, it dwindled through the time span towards below 40, which signifies that there was alighting enjoyment on fish and chips.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile fish and chips had ups and downs. For pizza consumption, starting from the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59118643396 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 10.7754060248 43.030603864 25% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127670415059 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582768231566 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838969631726 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130137795133 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718552973654 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.