The line chart compares the levels of coffee exports from 3 South American nations from 2002 to 2012 and is measured in millions of kilograms.
Overall, all countries saw an increase in their coffee exports over the graph period. However, Brazil’s coffee sales witnessed a significant rise compared to the other 2 countries.
In terms of Brazil, in the beginning, the sales stood at around 12.5 million kilograms and the value rose steadily to 20 million kilograms in 2008. Following that, 2008 to 2010 saw a slight reduction in the number of exports to around 18 million kilograms in 2010; however, there was a sharp rise in the sales to 25 million kilograms in 2012, which was the highest among the three nations.
Colombia started the period at 15 million kilograms, which was the highest value in 2002. However, there was a sharp fall in the levels of coffee exports to around 7.5 million kilograms in 2006, after which the sales increased gradually to 20 million kilograms in 2012. Costa Rica, which exported the least amount over the period began at 5 million kilograms in 2002, and despite the steady rise to 12.5 million kilograms in 2006, 2008 saw the lowest value of around 2.5 million kilograms. Then, the sales rose sharply to 15 million kilograms to finish the graph period.
- some people believe that learning a foreign language is a difficult task what are the most difficult things about learning a foreign language what is the best way to overcome them explain and include your personal experience or knowledge of this problem 73
- The graph below shows Twitter use by age group in the USA between November 2010 and May 2013 73
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 11
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95022624434 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43663372778 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9034269618 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.555555556 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11856254797 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690062284861 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609896939593 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108852245792 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653195998334 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.