The stipulated graph depicts the information regarding the number of foreign visitors to Australia over the period of 30 years and the chart shows which nationalities visited Australia during the same period. The mentioned parameters are South Korea, Japan, China, USA, Britain, Europe.
It is clear from the diagram that, there was an increasing trend over the period of 3 decades. In 1975, the number of visitors was just under 10 million. It was steadily raised and crossed 15 million tourists in 1985. At end of the period visitor numbers were peaked at 31 million in 2005. The sharpest rise was happened in 1995, almost 10 million increase as compared to the previous year.
The detailed view of the table reveals that, Australia received it's majority of tourists from Japan. There was a significant rise in the number of visitors, almost 6.8 million in 3 decades of time. South Korea also showed similar kind of trend and reached not so high as figures of 9.1 million in 2005 from 2.9 million in 1975. The volume of tourist from all the other countries like China, USA, Britain and Europe displayed a mere increase of 0.5 million, 0.8 million, 2 million and 2.4 million respectively.
In conclusion, it was evident from the data that Australia had been the favourite tourist destination for the travelers around the world supported by a steady steep growth in it's visitor numbers. In addition South Korean and Japanese tourists accounted for almost two third of the total tourists in Australia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew of the table reveals that, Australia received its majority of tourists from J...
^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...steep growth in its visitor numbers. In addition South Korean and Japanese tourists acco...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, third, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97628458498 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55099683866 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588932806324 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1622012904 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8461538462 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148610672193 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556227918101 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532105844709 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098900575047 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435167992578 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.