The given chart indicates the amount of oil was consumed and produced by Chinese between 1982 and 2006 (in millions of oil barrels per day).Overall,it is clear that both production and consumption of oil witnessed upward trends over the period
Accoriding to data,at the begin of period the number of oil barrels production which stood at around 2 million barrels per day, was slightly higher than the figure for oil barrel consumption.Over the following 8 years,the oil generation increased by 1 million barrels and remained almost unchanged until 1994 Meanwhile,that of oil consumption saw a stability until 1990 but there was a sharp rise by 1,5 million barrel after that 4 years
It is also noticeable that by 1994,the amount of oil consumption had surpassed that of oil production and continued significant grow .Finally,at the end of period the oil barrels consumption reached a peak of 6,4 million barrels which was twice as much as the figure for the oil was produced
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- More and more people are working at home rather than in the workplaces Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers and their families but others think it will bring stress to the home Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use cell phones at school To what extent do you agreed or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...2006 in millions of oil barrels per day.Overall,it is clear that both production and co...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... millions of oil barrels per day.Overall,it is clear that both production and consu...
^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...ends over the period Accoriding to data,at the begin of period the number of oil b...
^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... over the period Accoriding to data,at the begin of period the number of oil barrels pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which stood at around 2 million barrels per day, was slightly higher than the fi...
^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Over
...n the figure for oil barrel consumption.Over the following 8 years,the oil generatio...
^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...l consumption.Over the following 8 years,the oil generation increased by 1 million b...
^^^^
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
...ed almost unchanged until 1994 Meanwhile,that of oil consumption saw a stability unti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...roduction and continued significant grow .Finally,at the end of period the oil bar...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...duction and continued significant grow .Finally,at the end of period the oil barrels co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
... and continued significant grow .Finally,at the end of period the oil barrels consu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96273147244 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 162.0 22.4926829268 720% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 816.0 112.824112599 723% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 162.0 22.9334400587 706% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 5.23603664747 630% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217069170818 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217069170818 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183758379651 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678234630559 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 83.3 13.2329268293 629% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -76.03 61.2550243902 -124% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.1 10.3012195122 622% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.14 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.4 8.06136585366 179% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.8 10.9970731707 607% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.