The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed-line phones from 1994 to 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph gives information about the figure for African subscribers to 2 different types of phones between 1994 and 2004.
Overall, we can see that the rate of both mobile and fixed-line phones subscribers followed an upward trend over the period shown. Besides, there was a dramatic change in the percentage of people who subscribed to cell phones by the end of the period.
In 1994, the percentage of landline phones subscribers per 100 inhabitants in Africa was 1.7 much higher than the rate of cellular phones customers, only 0.06. The next five years witnessed a marginal rise to about 2.5 in the rate of African fixed-line phone users. Likewise, there was also a slight increase of 0,04 to 1 in the proportion of mobiles subscribers from 1994 to 1999.
From 1999 onwards, the rate of fixed-line phones subscriptions per 100 residents showed a gentle change from 2000 to 2003 and then almost reached a plateau of 3.1 in 2004. In the meantime, the period between 1999 to 2004 saw a significant increase in the African subscribing to mobiles of 7.8 and reached a peak of 8.8 in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the African subscribing to mobiles of 7.8 and reached a peak of 8.8 in 2004. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, likewise, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79365079365 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7180528125 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4485522919 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29952314889 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133836994102 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025588127354 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18536737387 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125032716998 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.