The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present

Essay topics:

The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present

The two maps describe the growth of seaside village in 1995 and now. Overall, it is readily apparent that, land for housing has expanded, since fish market has demolished to erect the apartments.

To begin with, it can be seen that, there was the forest park in 1995, but now it replaced with tennis court. Similarly, golf court is built on the place of farmland in the north-east side of seaside village. Moreover, in 1995, limited part of land occupied by houses, whilst at present count of houses either sides of the road, has increased.

In addition, there were shops situated at the west-east corner of the village, are demolished to build series of restaurants. Furthermore, the fish market has removed for making the apartments and fishing port that was in the middle of the sea, is missing now. Finally, new car park area has added near to the hotel.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-east side of seaside village. Moreover, in 1995, limited part of land occupied ...
^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of seaside village. Moreover, in 1995, limited part of land occupied by houses,...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent count of houses either sides of the road, has increased. In addition, t...
^^
Line 9, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dle of the sea, is missing now. Finally, new car park area has added near to the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, moreover, similarly, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79333333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45312499115 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.547931186 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.875 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134365967755 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624810657238 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992884057875 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928027620645 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070489638332 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.