The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at l

Essay topics:

The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket ( S ) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

The picture shows the possible sites for future plans of the new supermarket in Garlsdon town. Overall, the first supermarket is located in the countryside which is inconvenient for most of the population, while the second supermarket location is very strategic because it is located in the center of the town centre.

According to the picture, the first supermarket is located in the suburbs, which is only convenient for the people who live in the northern housing and Hindon that is located 12 km from there. However, there are only 10,000 people that live in Hindon.

As it can be seen, the second supermarket is located in the central of the town centre. Hence, it will be inconvenient for people who lived in southern housing, Bransdon, and Cransdon. The second supermarket is predicted to be more crowded because of the population. There are 44,000 population living in that area. Nevertheless, people can still go to the far supermarket because Garlsdon provides some infrastructure, such as main roads and railway, which can make people easier to move from south to the north. Moreover, the railway can make both supermarket connected to each other.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06770833333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84940581495 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.3573524933 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239716300932 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109551183913 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123624574184 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176630309732 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10879401829 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.