Below given map illustrates the two potential sites for a novel supermarket intended for the town of Garlsdon, with a populace of 65,000; wherein the locations under consideration are on the northwest and south of Garlsdon.
It can be noted that the proposed site S1, on the outskirts of Garlsdon, has a rail route relatively close by, intersecting the town; and, a main road connects the town of Hindon, 12 Kms afar, whose population is 10,000. Meanwhile, on the eastern side of S1 is a residential area whilst another housing area is located towards the south of S2.
With regard to S2, located within the town centre, a no parking zone, has a railway route fairly close to it, and, two main roads connecting the town to Bransdon, with 15,000 residents, 16 Kms away, and, Cransdon, lying at a distance of 25 Kms with a census of 29,000 residents respectively, hence making the supermarket easily accessible to their inhabitants.
In conclusion, both S1 and S2 have excellent accessibility to public transport. With respect to distance, S2 is easily accessible to majority of the population, but, being located in a no traffic zone makes it less convenient for car users. By contrast, S1, can provide exceptional parking space, since its situated in the outskirts, but, it cannot be easily accessed by the residents of the town and nearby areas; unless, they opt-in to avail the benefits of the public transport.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, while, in conclusion, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9539748954 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89479883525 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598326359833 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8963353455 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.142857143 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1428571429 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211645298577 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944468310304 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105981562973 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147475176676 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106846836644 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.