The maps below depict two different subterranean tunnel systems in two Australian cities.
The given two pictures illustrate the two distinct underground tunnel systems of two cities in Australia.
Overall, it is evident that there are striking differences between the two tunnels in terms of cost, size, time of construction and surrounding environment. The first tunnel costs approximately half as much as the second one; however, it required a longer period of time to construct. The second system, meanwhile, is dominant with regards to length, width and vehicle capacity.
Looking at the information in more detail, the first underground system, which took twelve years from 1986 to 1998 to complete, costs around $555 million and is constructed beneath a body of sand. The second tunnel, in stark contrast, was erected during four years between 2002 and 2006 but required a considerable $1,1 billion. This system is positioned underneath a layer of stone and clay.
As far as the size is concerned, the first tunnel is 1,5m wide and 2,2km long, while the second one’s width and length are 2,5m and 3,6km respectively. Whereas the former is only four lanes wide, the latter is six lanes wide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cond one; however, it required a longer period of time to construct. The second system, meanwh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...002 and 2006 but required a considerable ,1 billion. This system is positioned und...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05464480874 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74400744824 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9780804139 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227301403568 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941069033983 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126174178227 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164749024903 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156422581311 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.