The maps below show a cafe 10 years ago, 5 years ago and now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given three graphics illustrate the construction changes over three periods, divided into two spans five years of a cafe. From the general perspective, the cafe has witnessed a maintenance in the design with insignificant shifts of some specific areas.
On the one hand, the overall structure has observed a steadiness in the position. It is apparent that the restroom and food preparation have had no change in place after 10 years of reconstruction, both stay at the right and left corner of the store respectively. Another stability is seen in the table's location, which is still being situated at the middle and near to this section is the cash desk so far. Last but not least, the original entrance has remained constantly in its arrangement, between two terraces.
On the other hand, there are some gradual changes that could be recorded through the 10 years period. Initially, after a decade, the terraces are now filled with tables, which have been added to adapt to the increase in the number of consumers. Besides, a new counter has been installed in close proximity to the toilet and next to the cash desk. In the meantime, seven round tables located indoors have been replaced by 4 rectangular tables, which are clearly bigger and may serve more clients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tables'' or 'table's'?
Suggestion: tables'; table's
...ively. Another stability is seen in the tables location, which is still being situated...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...es, a new counter has been installed in close proximity to the toilet and next to the cash desk...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9488372093 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71340242707 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.761304004 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088641162857 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307188025536 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036764030716 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585602204082 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150916006193 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.