The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted maps illustrate the current and future developmental plans of Islip town center. It can be lucidly observed that a plethora of changes like the development of accessible amenities and the planning of dual carriageways are expected in the near future.
The main road will be constructed as a dual carriageway in the north and south direction instead of its central location between the shops and will be replaced by a pedestrian road. Also, the dual lane of shops will be converted to a single lane as the shops in northern directions will be replaced by new construction and developments like a bus station, shopping center, and parking divisions.
Additionally, areas of new housing will be devised and the park is expected to be smaller in size than before. On contrary to this, the location of the school and the housing are expected to remain exactly the same in the upcoming developmental planning of the Islip town center.
Overall, it can be worth mentioning that a lot of changes, new constructions, and relocations will be happening in future developmental planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
... devised and the park is expected to be smaller in size than before. On contrary to this, the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06629834254 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06468027588 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4872096432 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0813768830679 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515154894603 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519055510354 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568200409917 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503173451879 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.