The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton, a neighbouring town, since 1962.
The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton which is a neighboring town, over three periods (1962, 1985, and the present). Overall, Meadowside village enlarges size and become Meodowside suburb connected to Fonton. In addition, there are a significant alteration in terms of amenities, infrastructure, and accommodation during the period.
In 1962, there was only a completely area with no roads and rail crossing between Meadowside and Fonton –in the east of Meadowside village. Interestingly, not only did Meadowside village has the small road placed from the west to the northern Meadowside, there was also a rail line running through Fonton from eastern to the north-west of Fonton.
Subsequently, in 1985, both village experienced a considerable enlargement in their areas’ size. Therefore, the small road in Meadowside transformed to the main road and also extended to the east connecting to Fonton. while housing estate and leisure complex were constructed in the western and the eastern village each, supermarket had been built in the southern village.
Currently, Meadowside village –now a suburb– and Fonton are integrated. There were new business park, hotel and station positioned in the centre of those areas. The former constructed in the southern area although the two latter built in the northern area. Lastly, railway line has been elongated to the west associated with station.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('completely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('area') instead of another adjective.
... the period. In 1962, there was only a completely area with no roads and rail crossing between...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ended to the east connecting to Fonton. while housing estate and leisure complex were...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51363636364 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0080436244 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6229853447 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264575907346 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943038806255 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871381154307 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1580122691 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642940877975 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.