The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The two maps gives us the information about the area alongside the waterbody of Darwin town from 2009 and 2014.
The industrial area covered half of the Darwin town in 2009. However, that huge area was being substituted by the new footpath to the harbor which was new compare to 2009 map and a hefty forest make the waterfront area become greener and its atmosphere is fresher. At the center of the map, three residential buildings were built up new in 2014 beside three buildings were already built in 2009. New university building was built on the left of the residential building area. The industrial inside the rounded foot path in 2009 had been changed to a swimming pool.
Beside the difference of the dockland between 2009 and 2014, there were some unchanged objects. On the top of the map, there have been a fishing area since 2009. The school, convention center and 2 pools around the footpath at Northside were also unreplaced. The lake and small tree park inside the walkway also unaltered despite the change of industrial are next to them.
Overall, there is absolutely big replacement that affect the overall view of Darwin town especially the industrial area although there are some buildings and area are consisted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 61
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 61
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87619047619 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51578238282 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5703113092 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325400292156 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129212874723 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759624207287 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201317052567 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438317814741 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.