The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depict the major changes made to a city between 1950 and the present day.
As can be observed, the area has undergone significant modification with the expansion of residential and commercial areas as well as the improvement of the transport system to accommodate the rapid increase in its population.
In 1950, the total number of residents in this city was 20,000, populating mainly in the northern part of the river bank. To the south of the residential area was a commercial district which was accessed by two main roads leading to all parts of the city. In the far east, an airport was located. Whereas, the southern part which was separated from the North by a river was almost vacant with the existence of a government building residing right behind the bridge.
After being developed, the city has become more modern with the construction of infrastructures for housing and facilities for commercial purposes. In particular, due to the ten-fold increase in the population, the housing estates have been expanded, stretching to the ends of the river, which has been turned into a damped lake. Another noticeable alteration is the development of the business district across the bridge, making it double in size, while a larger government building has also been added not far from the old one which remains intact to the south. Accordingly, a new roadway system is also constructed to link it with the old bridge, and the other link the new bridge to the west. In addition, the airport has also been enlarged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the far east, an airport was located. Whereas, the southern part which was separated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...s district across the bridge, making it double in size, while a larger government building has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83322409722 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1242613034 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756089932269 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033127272863 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543697159067 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630459228782 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690318445023 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.