The maps give information about aa undetermined area

Essay topics:

The maps give information about aa undetermined area

Given are two maps depicting the modifications of an undetermined area from 1995 up to now.

It is conspicuous that the layout of the location is more likely to undergo some significant changes with the addition and elimination of numerous amenities over the period given.

To the south of the area, the main entrance remained its original location; however, the building's purpose was shifting. It was built for employees in 1960 and is, at the present, dedicated to visiting. The west and north west were filled with an office and a changing room for staff, respectively, but they were knocked down and replaced by a museum. Meanwhile, a parking area was erected beneath the staff’s changing room at the corner of the south west, after some years later, the location of this facility drifted somewhat to the right compare to the prior position.

When it comes to the south of the map, the lorry park was no longer in use and was demolished leaving the space vacant now; additionally, a new playground is built for children in the bottom south east. To the heart of the layout, a medical room was demolished to make way for a new café.. Furthermore, in the right-hand, two waste pits were completely destroyed and replaced by a driving truck track and a picnic area below. A noticeable swing is the emergence of a footpath which surround the café, picnic area and driving truck track.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...as demolished to make way for a new café.. Furthermore, in the right-hand, two was...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., picnic area and driving truck track.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84166666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70635825419 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579166666667 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7251538253 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101553002487 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440836820596 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568678436909 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766178144763 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746844413301 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.