The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005

The given pictures illustrate the differences occurring in Youngsville in New Zealand between the period 1980-2005.
Overall, it can be highlighted that this region experienced industrialization and modernization process with the appearance of numerous amenities as well as the decrease in the environmentally-friendly areas.
On the north bank of the Alannah river, the area for planting trees in 1980 was removed to make place for a large park near the position of the hospital. Furthermore, the lake at the central of the map had more ships for the purposes of travelling and business. On the left hand side of the map, residential housings were demolished to construct new parking area and a large stadium to meet citizens' demands.
On the other side of the river, while the location of school and airport remained unchanged after a 25-year period, numerous modifications have took place meanwhile. Firstly, several factories, which achieved the previous place of green trees, grew up with the soaring rate. Secondly, there were the appearance of high-rise buildings and skyscrapers contributed to changing the appearance of Youngsville. Besides, to boost the developments of region, a extended railway station located along the beach and a newly-built marina at the entrance of the river are regarded as important factors.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...ear period, numerous modifications have took place meanwhile. Firstly, several facto...
^^^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s, to boost the developments of region, a extended railway station located along ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39903846154 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30827574796 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644230769231 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3159213783 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226598571799 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786752469696 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897588901245 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127020397177 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105295845189 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.