The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016

Essay topics:

The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.

The maps illustrate the alterations of Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the replacement of the road which run and connect several university building.

To begin with the north side of the university, the buildings of biology, chemistry and physics, which were located in the north part of the university, were converted into science building in 2016. Moreover, in 2016, the position of the library remained unchanged, nevertheless, the function of it extended to become library and IT Suite in 2016. To the south of new science building, the position of the car park and the road had been replaced by new lecture theatre.

In accordance with the south part of the university, the existence of new footpaths changed the place of admin building and the road in 2010 in which admin building was moved to the south part of new lecture theatre. Furthermore, a new bus station and a new café, which were specifically in the west of new footpaths, had been built in the opposite of admin building.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (4 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93513513514 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76839092482 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7509051902 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183268522828 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114285291166 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177488198772 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160444704961 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156604932514 0.0819641961636 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.