The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given flow chart depicts the process of conversion of wasted glass bottles. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there are 3 stages in the whole recycling process, beginning with the collecting of wasted glass bottles and ending up with the usage in the supermarkets.

To begin, the wasted bottles are collected and delivered to the collection point, then they are transported to the glass factory. After that, bottles are cleaned in the high-pressure water. The process continues with the breaking of the bottles into small pieces in the glass factory. Then, pieces of bottles are burnt in the furnace with the high temperature between 600 and 800 degrees. Following this, recycled liquid glasses are shaped on the glass mould which is the prelast recycling process.

In the subsequent stage, after being shaped in the glass mould, the recycled bottles are ready for sale. At the final stage, new bottles are delivered to the supermarkets.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 56 view
2024-11-08 chino0301 view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
Essays by user Nurbakyt2oo1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng up with the usage in the supermarkets To begin the wasted bottles are collecte...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d which is the prelast recycling process In the subsequent stage after being shap...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96794871795 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48058702041 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 156.0 22.4926829268 694% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 775.0 112.824112599 687% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 156.0 22.9334400587 680% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239197105125 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239197105125 0.103423049105 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173890875369 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044363838884 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 80.0 13.2329268293 605% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -78.4 61.2550243902 -128% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 63.0 10.3012195122 612% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.73 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.61 8.06136585366 181% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.4 10.9970731707 586% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.