The line graph illustrates how much renewable energy was consumed by 6 distinct countries over the course of 40 years from 1917 to 2011.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of energy used in those nations experiences an upward trend except for Finland. Another interesting point is that while Finland registers the highest figures, United Kingdom has the lowest rate of power usage throughout the given period.
The rate of renewable energy using in the United States stood at 2,5 per cent of the total energy in 1971. After that, this figure fluctuated dramatically in the next 25 years till 1996 before witnessing the two folds soaring from 10% (in 1996) to nearly 20% (in 2011). In additions, a similar trend could be seen in Denmark, which rose by 2,5% beginning with 15% in 1917 and ending with roughly 17,5% in the year of 2011.
Furthermore, France, Germany and the United Kingdom were the 3 countries that had the quantity of renewable power-consuming went up progressively without any strong fluctuation. By 2011, the proportions of renewable energy used by French and German were around 15% that much higher than that of people in the United Kingdom which just above 5%.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004 61
- Sports help to build peace in the world Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching TV 84
- Many schools these days have problems with poor student behavior Why do you think these problems occur What could be done to tackle these problems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88059701493 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59690055218 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0813777752 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169635609501 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801901291704 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842847023735 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988438775567 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212081129819 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.