The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The circular chart shows amount of electric energy produced by Different fuel souces in Australia and France for 1980 and 2000 respectively.
Both countries produced nearly same amount of units of electricity during both years.Australia produced more units of electric energy in 1980's . France , however produced twice the energy in year 2000 than it made in 1980.Overall there was not much to differentiate between the 2 countries in terms of electricity production.
Coal was the most used fuel source in Australia .The percentage of units of electricity produced by coal was 50 percent in 1980 which further increased to 75 percent in 2000.Other minor producers were Hydro power which had produced more energy in 1980's than 2000.
In France there was no standout Fuelsource.
In 1980 Coal and Natural gas made 50 percent of the electric energy, followed by Oil and Nuclear power , which further generated remaining 35 percent. But situation changed drastically in 2000 where Nuclear power met more than 75 percent demands of Electric energy, remaining units were generated by Coal and oil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Australia
... units of electricity during both years.Australia produced more units of electric energy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... produced more units of electric energy in 1980s . France , however produced twice the e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d more units of electric energy in 1980s . France , however produced twice the ene...
^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...its of electric energy in 1980s . France , however produced twice the energy in ye...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...nergy in year 2000 than it made in 1980.Overall there was not much to differentiate bet...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s the most used fuel source in Australia .The percentage of units of electricity p...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...the most used fuel source in Australia .The percentage of units of electricity prod...
^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
...further increased to 75 percent in 2000.Other minor producers were Hydro power which ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ro power which had produced more energy in 1980s than 2000. In France there was no st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nergy, followed by Oil and Nuclear power , which further generated remaining 35 pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82099121148 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0615330732 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216114828272 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117680658831 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679779304157 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136739355495 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734967843813 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.