The chart gives information regarding the causes of worldwide land degration and how these have affected three region of the world during the 1990's 35% and 30% land degration is caused by over-grazing and deforestation whereas 28% of land is used for over - cultivation. On the other hand only 7% is used for other reasons.
Land degraded by deforestation in North America is lowest with 0.2%, compared with, Europe has highest of 9.8% and Oceanta of 1.7%. In contrast over-grazing is highest in Oceanta of 11.3% with lowest of 1.5% in North Amercia and 5.5% in Europe. However, land used for over-cultivation is negligible in Oceanta, with 7.7% in Europe and 3.3% in North America. As a result, total land degraded in North America is 5% with a highest of 23% in Europe and 13% in Oceanta.
To sum up, most of European land was degraded by cutting down trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...ation and how these have affected three region of the world during the 1990's 35%...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the world during the 1990's 35% and 30% land degration is caused by over...
^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion whereas 28% of land is used for over cultivation. On the other hand only 7% i...
^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...highest of 9.8% and Oceanta of 1.7%. In contrast over grazing is highest in Oceanta of 1...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...nd degraded in North America is 5% with a highest of 23% in Europe and 13% in Oce...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.308108108108 0.268076937826 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.12972972973 0.116061578633 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0594594594595 0.0759168565197 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0162162162162 0.0366838410393 44% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.205405405405 0.155750635184 132% => OK
Participles: 0.0594594594595 0.0379272487307 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56067387752 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00540540540541 0.0210936926555 26% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0108108108108 0.00175180941692 617% => OK
Determiners: 0.0432432432432 0.0948980150116 46% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00540540540541 0.00967000014798 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 873.0 1161.00487805 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.9 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 5.90752243213 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.307189542484 0.337110787985 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241830065359 0.247514529752 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.150326797386 0.171178102325 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0718954248366 0.112407865282 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56067387752 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.546246751206 101% => OK
Word variations: 44.6701798027 49.3433353143 91% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8571428571 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7474301041 42.9750493124 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 135.714022679 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.689975730869 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.48048780488 338% => OK
Readability: 46.0401493931 47.7609492067 96% => OK
Elegance: 3.92592592593 2.94281807926 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240745468681 0.418131533498 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.322194923764 0.181151798455 178% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.226501322875 0.0850326197045 266% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.806050733049 0.706616315825 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163553539981 0.157042692854 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120368949472 0.228904883108 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139385453223 0.108899403657 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.14991245531 0.367819155151 41% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0512146251196 0.0812612215331 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181097865261 0.316326947829 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183189299134 0.0921553760075 199% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.14146341463 438% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 0.956097560976 523% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.