The pie chart illustrates the primary causes for land degradation all over the world; whereas the table shows the proportion of land afflicted by those reasons in three areas namely North America, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that land was made less productive mostly by over-grazing. Additionally, Europe had the largest amount of land degraded in the three areas surveyed.
In terms of reasons for land degradation, over-grazing contributed 35%, followed by 30% of deforestation. The third motive was from over-cultivation, which accounted for 38%. Finally, only 7% of the land was destroyed by other factors.
Meanwhile, Europe had 23% of total land degraded, in which nearly 10% was from deforestation. The proportion of land degradation in Oceania and North America was significantly low, just 13% and 5% respectively. However, overgrazing spoilt 11.3% of Oceania’s land while over-cultivation destroyed the largest amount of land in North America, at 3.3%.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which the goods are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 89
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55844155844 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31303766755 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9777728373 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184971889064 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745213681028 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899983053054 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131527013826 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11130324564 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.