The pie charts illustrate the composetion of electricity of Germany and France and the component of renewable energy in the two countries in the year of 2009.
Overall, the majority of electricity in Germany was generated from conventional thermal and the biomass and wind engendered renewable energy composed most of the whole renewable energy in the year of 2009. Meanwhile, nuclear produced a large sector of France electricity and hydroelectric constituted the majority of renewable energy.
In Germany, the largest section of electricity was generated by conventional thermal, which wea 59.8%. Nuclear and renweable ranked the second and third with the percentage of 23% and 17.4% respectively. Concerning to specific component of renewable energy, biomass and wind engendered 39% ana 36%, respectively, of the total renewable energy. Besides, hydroelectric comprised 17.7% of the entire renewable electricity.
In France, nuclear composed 76% of the whole energy. Conventional thermal and renewables comprised 10% and 13% respectively. Regarding the the detailed constitution of renewable energy, the majority of it was comprised by hydroelectric, which was 80%. Biomass and wind merely generated 8% and 10% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...sed 10% and 13% respectively. Regarding the the detailed constitution of renewable ener...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...sed 10% and 13% respectively. Regarding the the detailed constitution of renewable ener...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81868131868 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28316358784 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4425527605 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182173690136 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743835790076 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080042303922 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147767700722 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917960826829 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 61.2550243902 63% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.