The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The chart above illustrates mean day-to-day expenditures from 1950 to 2010. At first glance, it can be seen that over the period given there were significant changes.
In 1950 Housing had the greatest share of the total, at just under 73%, however, figure had dropped to exactly 22% by 2010. Then, at slightly 11% stands Food, which is the second largest sector of the total. During the 60 years the situation had gradually changed, and by the end of the period, people's expenditure on food was at just 34%.
Transportation had a small minority in 1950 at just under 4%, followed by a growth fourth as many as it was by 2010. Other expenditure was one of the smallest part of the total in 1950, but it had risen from just 5% to slightly 20% over the interval. Health care and education's figures had not changed much, their indexes were at about 3 and 6% in 1950 and roughly at 5 and 7% in 2010 respectively.
- The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 70
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 67
- A number of tertiary courses require students to undertake a period of unpaid work at an institution or organisation as part of their programme. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of course requirement? 61
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50602409639 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54975172342 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6411748908 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150016855748 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758665716061 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667178316157 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116400137247 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361762680583 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.