The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

The mentioned two pie charts illustrate the proportion of various kinds of energy generation of France in two different years 1995 and 2005.

Overall, it is clear from the charts that there is a great proportion of coal used for energy production in both the years. In contrast, there is relatively less proportion of other sources of energy in both the years.

In the year 1995, coal accounted for 29.80% of the total energy generated which is expected to increase slightly by 1.13% in 2005.Even though, other source of energy in 1995 accounted for 4.90% whereas it increases steadily up to 9.10% by the year 2005.

In 2005, both gas as well as petro had a figure of approximately 29% each and it is expected that the former will rise by 0.68% in 2005 while a drop of 9.72% is estimated for the latter. In addition to this Nuclear energy is expected to increase by 3.7% in 2005 from a count of 6.40% in 1995.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (366 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
...d to increase slightly by 1.13% in 2005.Even though, other source of energy in 1995 ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... by the year 2005. In 2005, both gas as well as petro had a figure of approximately 29%...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58181818182 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5024212334 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.612015365 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215620486948 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129132825455 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128957614615 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160857324545 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143844065906 0.0819641961636 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.