The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The pie charts give information about electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1950 and 2010.
Overall, the pie charts had exchanges in 1950 and 2010, especially Germany had nuclear but New Zealand did not have it.
In 1980, the ratio total of electricity generation in New Zealand was higher than that in Germany. The ratio of coal in New Zealand standed at first with 56 units meanwhile it in Germany was 28 units. Nevertheless The ratio of hidro in New Zealand beyonded a larger than that in Germany by 23 units. The ratio of natural gas in Germany was a little more lower than in New Zealand . While New Zealand did not have nuclear the ratio of nuclear in Germany was 20 units. The ratio of petroleum in Germany was a bit larger than that in New Zealand ( 12 units in comparison with 22 units).
In 2010, total electricity generation of New Zealand was lower than that in Germany. New Zealand still did not have nuclear the ratio of nuclear in Germany increased to standed at first to . New Zealand consumed more coal than Germany by 122 units. Howerver the ratio of natural gas in New Zealand was as high as that in Germany. The ratio in Germany was much lower than that in New Zealand ( 2 units as against 46 units). The ratio of petroleum in Germany was slightly higher than that in New Zealand ( 27 units compared with 2 units).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...s meanwhile it in Germany was 28 units. Nevertheless The ratio of hidro in New Zealand beyo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it in Germany was 28 units. Nevertheless The ratio of hidro in New Zealand beyond...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
... of natural gas in Germany was a little more lower than in New Zealand . While New Zealand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... a little more lower than in New Zealand . While New Zealand did not have nuclear ...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...little more lower than in New Zealand . While New Zealand did not have nuclear the ra...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as a bit larger than that in New Zealand 12 units in comparison with 22 units. I...
^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Germany increased to standed at first to . New Zealand consumed more coal than Ger...
^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was much lower than that in New Zealand 2 units as against 46 units. The ratio o...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...slightly higher than that in New Zealand 27 units compared with 2 units.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, nevertheless, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49593495935 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37507872699 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.333333333333 0.547539520022 61% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.6506725978 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377272355478 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198567394825 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118447602993 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334911484059 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134002375544 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.