The 3 given pie charts illustrate how the Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom handled hazardous waste products in 5 different ways.
Overall, the Korean government mostly accelerated recycling in dealing with waste products, while the main method used by both Sweden and the UK was undergrounding the waste, which was more commonly used in Britain. Moreover, there were 2 other methods used in the UK that did not exist in Korea or Sweden (chemical treatment and dumping waste at sea).
In South Korea, recycling was the most popular way in solving waste products as this method accounted for 69 per cent. The second most common method was to bury the garbage under the ground, which made up for 22%. The final method was incineration, accounting for only 9 per cent.
In Sweden, more than half of waste products were handled by undergrounding (55%). At the same time, people also tended to the 2 methods of recycling and burning the waste, which accounted for 25% and 20% respectively.
In the United Kingdom, similar to Sweden, undergrounding the waste was the most prominent method since it made up 82%. Here, chemical treatment and dumping waste at sea both accounted for 8%. The last one was the incineration method. which accounted for only 2%.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at leas 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...e last one was the incineration method. which accounted for only 2%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94392523364 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6513410895 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2533134813 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848524850982 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366741340602 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441678517273 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643211674518 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470131528389 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.