The pie charts illustrate the different ways of handling dangerous waste produce in Sweden, the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Korea.
Overall, five various methods have been used in the three countries including incineration, underground disposal, chemical treatment, recycling and dumping at sea. The UK has used four ways in different percentages, while the other two nations have only used three methods. Furthermore, incineration is the commonest method used by Swedish and UK governments.
Firstly, 82% of dangerous waste in the United Kingdom has been buried underground, while 16% of garbage produce undergoes chemical treatment and dumping at sea equally. However, only 2% has been incinerated and none has undergone recycling. On the contrary, in Sweden, 25% of dangerous waste produce undergoes recycling. Although the majority of garbage (55%) is buried underground similar to the UK, a significant percentage (20%) is incinerated in Sweden.
Lastly, the Republic of Korea recycles the majority (69%) of dangerous waste, while 22% is buried underground and only 9% is incinerated.
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore somecertain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extentdo you agree or disagree 73
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 84
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at leas 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56547619048 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04333194559 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9109217994 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904022829951 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408962753688 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401452386758 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630962707243 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03700535585 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.