The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The stipulated pie-charts manifests information that how three prominent countries Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom coped up with perilous waste material.
overall the key points to note all that Republic of Korea used the most sustainable method recycling at high extent whereas united kingdom preferred to do under grounding of waste products.
Apropos to the detail of the charts, that nearly quarter of the waste material was undergrounded by Republic of Korea and this proportion was more than double in Sweden however fourth-fifth percentile of of these products were get ridden by the same process in united kingdom. Moreover, Republic of Korea chosen the most environment friendly way recycling. Interestingly, 70% of waste products were undergone recycling process in this country while this criteria was not even used by United Kingdom. Furthermore, quarter of these products were recycled in Sweden.
Probing further, one-fifth of these were incineration in Sweden and only a petty fraction 9% and 2% products destroyed by incineration in Republic of Korea and United Kingdom respectively . Apart from this, 8% of waste products were dumped at sea and similar fraction were chemically treated in U.K.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ped up with perilous waste material. overall the key points to note all that Republi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
... Sweden however fourth-fifth percentile of of these products were get ridden by the s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...th percentile of of these products were get ridden by the same process in united ki...
^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...recycling process in this country while this criteria was not even used by United Ki...
^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of Korea and United Kingdom respectively . Apart from this, 8% of waste products w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48421052632 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86296969737 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7185010256 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993513354455 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052023533431 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618215190755 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796944345717 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757362612204 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.