The pie charts below show the proportion of energy produced by different sources in one country in 1985 and 2003.
The illustrated pie graphs compare the percentage of energy generated in terms of 5 different non-renewable resources in the years of 1985 and 2003.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that the percentage of oil usages in both years were the highest proportion compared to others. Hydroelectric power was the only energy that had its percentage stayed the same, while others experienced dramatic changes.
In 1995, the percentage of energy that was generated from oil occupied 52% of country total energy production, which quadrupled the figure for natural gas of 13%. The disparity of percentage of coal and nuclear was very high in the first year, with 8% and 22% respectively. The lowest figure in the first examined year was hydroelectric power, where only 4% of total energy was generated.
8 years after 1995, the figure for oil declined dramatically, from 52% to only 39% respectively. Similarly, there was a slight decrease for that of nuclear power to 17%. On the contrary, natural gas and coal were more commonly use, where the percentage of gas rose to 23% and that of coal increased to 13%, with 10% and 5% different from previous examined year respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88308221364 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5699059978 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111112556923 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05092341758 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666116584706 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905363503601 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771680431553 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.