Given are the pie charts contrasting the myriad sources of energy for electricity production in Australia and French, commencing from 1980 to 2000.
In terms of the fuel sources in Australia, coal constituted a half of total production with 50 units recorded. Meanwhile, hydropower and natural gas accounted for 20 units for each which was twofold the use of oil. In the next 20 years, coal became the main source for electricity production with 130 units exceeding the use of hydropower with 36 units. In the interim, oil and natural gas plunged to be the least sources of energy with just 2 units recorded.
Regarding the figures in France, in 1980, besides the 4 fuel sources, this country can utilise nuclear power to produce energy with 15 units which had by far the highest figures with 126 units recorded in the next 20 years. The figure of coal had stayed unchanged with 25 units but there was a diminution of natural gas with only 2 units although these two sources of energy accounted for the same amount in 1980. The amount of oil using for producing electricity in 1980 nudged up to 25 units while the opposite was true for the use of hydropower with 2 units recorded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie charts contrasting the myriad s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54583991064 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9497731533 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195988629188 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113534670449 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710501167728 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17786730636 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648297672194 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.