The pie charts illustrate e-commerce sales in electronics and Appliance, Food & beverage, home furnishing and video games, in Canada over 5 years (2005 - 2010).
Overall, it is clear that vast majority of online sales, Canadians, made for entertainment. While food and beverage experienced increase in sales, in contrast, Canadian bought on-line significantly less furniture.
Canadian spent the most money online purchasing electronic and appliances and video games. Although, proportion in sales reverse by 5% in both categories (18% to 23% and 35% to 30% respectively), total proportion remained same (53 per cent).
As for home furnishing and video games, similar reverse trend is seen, however, more significant. In 2005, people spent one quarter in on-line shopping of buying furniture, while 5 years later, only 15 per cent purchases of furniture have been made. In terms of food & beverage, 10 per cent increase in 5 years is seen (22% to 32%).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96409372246 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686666666667 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2991040819 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179131949093 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695727261908 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787141099947 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111336382331 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862146627405 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.