The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The maps illustrate the design in the sports centre of university before and after reconstruction.
It can be clearly seen that both outdoor courts will be dismantled and the sports centre will expand more westerly and easterly. Overall, the present facilities will save for further development.
As for the designing currently, reception is built at the entrance as well as there is a changing room on the left-hand door and the user is available to get in the 25 meters swimming pool via the door inside the changing room. Also, seating post on the right-hand door as well as Gym room places on the north of the building. As far as outdoor courts, which set on both sides of the centre.
In future designs, the building will expand instead of the outdoor courts. Sports shop and cafe would open after entering the entrance and turn left or right. The amount of changing room would be triple, in addition to the original, the others will plan on the corner independently. Moreover, leisure pool is possible in the future as well as established on the west, furthermore, there will be a sports hall next to the seating. After that, on the east, there will be two dance studios and finally, the size of the Gym room will be larger than its original design.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... the west, furthermore, there will be a sports hall next to the seating. After that, o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be larger than its original design.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, moreover, so, well, as for, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7149321267 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56047831878 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1008053656 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120237133015 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503929766254 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403840641033 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882053730153 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486415812936 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.