The given plans present 2 types of student room which one is for 2 people and one is for 1 person with sufficient facilities and different fees at an Australian university.
Coming to the student room for 2 people, which costs $350 per week, the room is 6 meters long and 4 meters wide. There are 2 chairs, a table placing on the left side of the room, next to the table are two cupboards which separate two beds with two study desk. There are a TV and a small bookshelf respectively in the left hand of study desk 2 and study desk 1. In the left corner of the room, a bathroom is constructed on the left side of the entrance door while a sink, a stove and a microwave are in the right direction.
Turning to the student room for one person, which covers a permission fee of 200 dollars per week, this room is more narrowed compared to the first one. Both 2 two rooms are 6 meters in length but the former room is 4 meters in width while this room is 2,5 meters only. The facilities in this room are quite similar exclude the table and chairs, a bookshelf, a bathroom, a television, a bed companied with a study desk and the cupboard because this is a single room.
Overall, the two rooms are designed for different demands of different type of students with an appropriate fee level for particular facilities the university provides.
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five years period 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'desk' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'desks'.
Suggestion: desks
... which separate two beds with two study desk. There are a TV and a small bookshelf r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'TVs'?
Suggestion: TVs
...o beds with two study desk. There are a TV and a small bookshelf respectively in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3734939759 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53646810046 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469879518072 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.2352912919 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463376456711 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204643926318 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147200045267 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330308591982 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10300436441 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.