The plans below shows a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relavent.
The plans illustrate the layout of the Grange Park back when it was first opened (1920) and the present. It represents how much the park has developed over the years.
Overall, the seating which was in the west side of the public park has shifted to the center area around the Rose Garden, which previously used to be located on either side of the stage for musicians. Many new significant infrastructural changes can also be seen.
In 1920, the Fountain is in the middle of the park, to the west of which is present the Musicians’ stage and Seats. To the east of the Fountain, there is a small pond for all the water plants. There are two entrances and to the right of which a Glasshouse and another Rose Garden is situated.
Over the few years, the Park’s framework has developed considerably. In the present, the stage in 1920, has been converted to an Amphitheatre for the concerts. The Rose Garden is moved to the center of the park and Seats are arranged around it so that the audience can view the concerts.
The current unique features that have been added are, the Café, that is built to right of Arnold Avenue entrance, next to which a Children’s play area is located. Another new attribute that has been launched is the Underground car park, it is situated right below the latest Water feature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66239316239 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53925640092 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5307667773 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9166666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184889490029 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699725111695 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720110521562 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110498636756 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076422307158 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.