The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps give information about the plans change of a small theater from 2010 to 2012.
It is clear that the small theater witness radical change with the most noticeable being the admin office and restaurant in the main door.
The theater was designed in 2010 including dressing room, storage, stage, auditorium, cafe, admin office and the ticket office. The ticket office directly accessible main door and next to the cafe and below the admin office. Look at the map in 2012, the theater have the restaurant and storage replaced to ticket office and admin office and the ticket office replaced to the cafe on the left.
While the remain at the bottom it is become more spaces and go to the main door we will se the auditorium and stage on the top. Meanwhile, compared to the present, today theater have few new places (2 places), the shows and the coordination. Besides, the theater after two years don’t have management and control department areas. Now this places expanded to new places. Summarize informs by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. So, it can be seen that the small theater in 2012 modern than in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...placed to the cafe on the left. While the remain at the bottom it is become more spaces ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81592039801 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37713087966 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3032646751 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329684260223 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130599833797 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139711312825 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215852920156 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113877127052 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.