Revenue Sources and Expenditures of a USA Charity in one year, 2016.
Task 1 Sample - Revenue sources and expenditure of a charityTask 1 Sample - Revenue sources and expenditure of a charity
These two pie charts indicate amounts of annual charity cash flow in usa from revenue sources and expenditures in 2016. Overall, it is clear that total revenue sources is slightly more than total expenditures from usa charity, which is most significant income in revenue sources is food donation which five others are just have little amount of money. Then, in expenditures the highest spending is program services, whereas two others are under 3%.
First, from revenue sources food donation noted 86.6% from $53,561,580 in total. this amount was tremendously more high than community contributions which just 10.4% of total revenue. Next, on program revenue accounted only 2.2% from total. But it was slightly more high than investment income, government grants, and other income which was just 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% from total revenue.
Furthermore, program services accounted 95.8% from $53,224,896 in total. this amount was extremely far more than fundraising and management general, which was only 2.6% for the former and 1.6% for the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...on noted 86.6% from 3,561,580 in total. this amount was tremendously more high than ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ccounted 95.8% from 3,224,896 in total. this amount was extremely far more than fund...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51401946046 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.571746234 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22535839494 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107738048766 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126364827126 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157211879591 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166480147367 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.