These pie charts analyse the main difference in the population of Yemen and Italy in three different categories (0-14,15-59 and 60+) of age groups in year 2020, and discuss how population will alter in the year 2050 percentage wise.
Overall, at the beginning of the period 60+ years citizen of Yemen and 0-14 age group population of Italy covered smaller section whereas 15-59 years will cover greater part of inhabitants.
As given in the pie charts of Yemen, more than 50 percent of population(50.1%) was occupied by 0-14 years age group in 2000 whereas 60 and above years age group cover 3.6 per cent of total population. Similarly, remaining of the population (46.3%) was dwelt by 15-59 years age group. While making projections for 2050 of Yemen population, it is predicted that the population from 0-14 age group downfall by 13% to the figure of 37% whereas the population of 15-59 years age group is projected to be increased by 21% standing with 57.3%. The population of old age people is also negligibly by 2.1% to the figure of 5.7%.
In other hand, greater section of population of Italy was 15-59 years slightly above 60% while 0-14 years of residents were 14.3% people with ages 60+ were found to be roughly 25%. In 2050, the prediction was made number will increase by approximately 20 percentage of 60 years and above (42.3%) while in the same time nearly 15 percent of citizen will be decreased aged 15-59 (46.2%). In the mean time, it was hoped that 0-14 yeas of age group population will decrease by close to 3% to fall in 11.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...zen will be decreased aged 15-59 46.2%. In the mean time, it was hoped that 0-14 y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71217712177 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.555733516 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490774907749 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9048196481 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155134345762 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860794763014 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049898945275 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113728352519 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481646272309 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.