The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates how many staffs (cartergoried by genders) and factories in two countries namely UK and Wales over the period of 5 decades.
Overall, while the number of both males and female workers witnessed a considerable decrease, the opposite trend was experienced for factories. Interestingly, starting with a big gap in the number of employees, men and women underwent different plunges to end the period survey at approximately same number.
In 1851, there was 287.100 male staffs, while the figure for female was nearly a half – at 190.000. The years to 1971 saw a significantly workforce reduction with only 80.123 and 60.000 for two above genders, respectively. The similar trend continued without broken point to end the periods show with only about 30,000 for both men and women in term of workers. The figures for total employees, whereby, reduce by nearly five times over the periods shown, from nearly 477.100 to just 61.000 in 1901.
Regarding to the number of factories, an increasingly fluctuation was seen during 50 years analyzed. Beginning at only 225 locations, the quantities of manufactures rocket its’ mount to reach a peak of 721 in 1881 before declining to end the period at 600 in 1901
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('workforce') instead of another adjective.
...alf – at 190.000. The years to 1971 saw a significantly workforce reduction with only 80.123 and 60.000 f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... both men and women in term of workers. The figures for total employees, whereby, r...
^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
... Regarding to the number of factories, an increasingly fluctuation was seen during 50 years analyzed. Begi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11822660099 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86434458426 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630541871921 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6132267642 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0782530883844 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332246268489 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255670599062 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05331156585 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213726942243 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.