The table compares the proportion of national consumption went to in five countries in the year 2002.
It's clear that the expenditure spent on food, drinks and tobacco was the main cost in all nations, especially in Turkey. While, surprisingly the numbers of leisure and education merely took up the least percentage for each nation as well.
Money spent on food and drinks in Turkey was at 32.14%, and Irish's data seen as the second large amount in this group was 28.91%. The figures of Italy, Spain and Sweden didn't see much disparity of 16.35%, 18.80% and 15.77% respectively. Clothing and Footwear wasn't given attentions like people's diet, and except Italian who spent comparative higher percentage as 9%, the numbers of other four countries were approximately the same level, from 5.40% to 6.63%.
In the group of leisure and education, proportions among the five nations appeared an slowly decreasing trend. Turkish's figure were the biggest at 4.35% and the numbers went down to 3.22% of Swedish, following given numbers at 3.20%, 2.21% and 1.98% respectively from Italy, Ireland and Spain.
- Fashion has become more and more important when people choose clothes. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005 70
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... The figures of Italy, Spain and Sweden didnt see much disparity of 16.35%, 18.80% an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...77% respectively. Clothing and Footwear wasnt given attentions like peoples diet, and...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ortions among the five nations appeared an slowly decreasing trend. Turkishs figur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14444444444 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57866364089 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0117170339 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0593549817561 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329461008764 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640064383597 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590087633407 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806762394892 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.