The table below gives information about population of over 60 year-olds in six regions in 2000, and the predicted number of population over 60 in 2050. It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050. Summarise the information in the following three tables and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table illustrates the data about public over sixty-year-old in 6 different continents in 2000 as well as forecasted the number of public over sixty by 2050. At the least, it also indicates the globe population of over sixty in 2000 and 2050.
It can be seen from the table that, by 2050, it is forecasted that all the 6 different continents population of over sixty will rise than the year 2000. In 2000, the citizens over sixty were lowest in the area of The Africa and The Latin America at 5% and 7% respectively. The North America, Oceania, Asia and the Whole World citizens remained almost stable at 11%,11%,12%, and 13% in 2000. But, Europe people over 60 made it double compared to previous area.
Another column shows that what will change by 2050. It is clear that, the Whole World society over 60 will be seen twice as in 2050 than of 2000. However, here again the Africa society will remain at the bottom with 12% and Europe will be at the top with 31%. Both Asia and Oceania will make it double population than that was in year 2000.
Overall, Africa population remain at the least where Europe populations remain at the top in both the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'continents'' or 'continent's'?
Suggestion: continents'; continent's
... is forecasted that all the 6 different continents population of over sixty will rise than...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Europe) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...%,11%,12%, and 13% in 2000. But, Europe people over 60 made it double compared to prev...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57819905213 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38742164799 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488151658768 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3206311886 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8181818182 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359056005835 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155772598814 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946923270712 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229186058923 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929001323226 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.