The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011. summarise the information making comparisions where relevant.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about the pupils studying in different six departments in 2011 in an Australian university. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen that, the highest percentage of females was in Humanities department at 72 and followed by Education department at 6. Moreover, the lowest ratio of females had been studying in Engineering at 15 and the second lowest department was Information Technology at 17. The ratio of females was similar in Science and Physics department.
Moving further, There was a maximum percentile of First language not English and Born outside Australia in Information technology at 49 and 56 respectively. The minimum proportion of both was studying in Humanities department at 12 and 20. The second lowest ratio department was Education both the student at 16 and 23. In Engineering department both was similar at 42% and 48%. In Science and Physics department both had been studied in the range of 31 and 56.
Overall, females ratio was highest in Humanities department While the percentage of First language not English that was lowest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23655913978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.043732579 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478494623656 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3210258298 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162234510384 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078360844187 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095512715584 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131502567979 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106053127526 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.