The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table compares the statistics of six underground railway systems in different metropolises, namely London, Paris, Tokyo , Washington, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
It can be seen clearly that in terms of age and size, the system of London came first, while that of the figure for passengers was occupied by Tokyo. In addition to this, three oldest underground systems outweigh these modern ones in all aspects.
From a quick glance at the length of the route, London was the longest railway system with nearly 400 kilometres which approximately doubled that of Paris constructed in 1900. Besides, the data of Tokyo and Washington DC was far less significant in comparison with the previous one, respectively occupied the third and fourth place with exactly 155 and 126 kilometres. The most undesirable figure for length was recorded in the establishment of the underground system in Kyoto and Los Angeles with under 30 kilometres.
Moving on to analyse the number of passengers annually, the passenger figure for Tokyo was by far the highest with more than 1900 million per year. The statistics of Paris and London were far less noteworthy with nearly 1200 and 755 accurately. Finally, Kyoto and Los Angeles witnessed a similar trend compared to that of length within 50 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...etropolises, namely London, Paris, Tokyo , Washington, Kyoto and Los Angeles. It ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13397129187 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77225073716 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0857471831 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845768151199 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394346080831 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416270434513 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642455868864 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477145590808 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.