The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the proportion of under ground railway in six various cities (London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles). The passengers per year is measured by millions.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is crystal clear that Paris and Tokyo had the highest number of passengers and Kyoto and Los Angeles had the lowest.
London railway system was the oldest that initiated in 1863 and the whole route was 394 km and there were 775 million passengers in a single as well. However, Los Angeles railway was opened in 2001 and there were only 50 million passengers and the route were merely around 28 km. Both Paris and Tokyo embarked in 1900 and 1927 and moreover they had the most quantity of passengers more than 1000 million and the whole route were more than 150 km as well. The railway systems in Washington DC and Kyoto were initiated in around 1980s. It is evident that 11 km was the shortest route that produced in Kyoto and the amount of passengers per year was 45 million and on the contrary, Washington Dc had 144 million people and the whole route was around 130 km.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67857142857 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34442522899 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3647632279 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0545909263741 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337682254265 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041491172212 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453819362525 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419278485176 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.