The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities
The table provides information about the railroad systems which are built beneath the ground in six different cities, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles, and it is compared in three category like date opened, kilometres of route and passengers per year in terms of millions. It is also worth noting that while those system in London, Paris and Tokyo are the oldest ones, they still attract more people than the others.
To specify, there are the smallest number of the kilometres of route and passengers per year in the railway systems of Los Angeles and Kyoto although they was opened recently. By contrast, in spite of being introduced in the twentyth century, those in Paris and Tokyo still have the highest amount of passengers in a year with the figure for passengers in Paris being 1191 and that of Tokyo being 1927. Besides, the underground system in Washington DC was built in 1970s but its length and passengers are mediocre. Suprisingly, despite the underground railroad in London opened sooner than other systems, its length reaches the furthest distance at 394 kilometres.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...os Angeles, and it is compared in three category like date opened, kilometres of route a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this system' or 'those systems'?
Suggestion: this system; those systems
...ons. It is also worth noting that while those system in London, Paris and Tokyo are the olde...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...round system in Washington DC was built in 1970s but its length and passengers are medio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03783783784 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53074592664 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.183114775 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.333333333 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147555424148 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705996491576 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521859958554 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11699517154 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321811794019 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.