the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below show data about consumer expenditure on the different categories in five nations in 2002. These are Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey.
It is explicit that food, drinks and Tobacco amounts the highest proportion in the spending trend by the consumers. On the contrary leisure and education just expressed the small percentages in consuming.
Firstly, in the first column describes about the qualities of food, drinks and Tobacco consuming, Turkey achieved the highest with 32.4%. Compare to Turkey, expenditure in Sweden reached a half approximately 15.77%.
Secondly, Italy stayed in long distance with the other countries around 9.00%. Following back with the amounts almost the same were Turkey (6.63%), Spain (6.51%) and Ireland (6.43%). Repeating again Sweden stood on the shortest place with 5.40%.
Thirdly, the smallest percentage belongs to Spain equivalent 1.98% on consuming for leisure and education. Particularly, resembling to Sweden, Turkey the second time developed to achieve the highest with 4.35% which is rise almost 2.35% to Spain’s.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'Repeating'.
Suggestion: Repeating
...y 6.63%, Spain 6.51% and Ireland 6.43%. Repeating again Sweden stood on the shortest place with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, third, thirdly, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60365853659 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67178256417 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0433548647 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5454545455 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767416127424 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318035660801 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716082739947 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510465691326 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733214772458 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.