The given table provides information about the majority of tourists who visited Ashdown museum before and after the innovation, whereas the pie charts show the satisfaction proportion of those masses who went same museum.
Overall, it is interesting to note that before modelisation, there was the highest percentage of those visitors who were dissatisfied, but after renewal this proportion decreased, as a result, the number of tourists had increased around one fourth of earlier visitors.
It can be clearly seen that, there were 74000 people who went to museum before refurbishment, but 40% of them were dissatisfied followed by 30% visitors who were very dissatisfied regarding Museum amenities which was the double of satisfied persons. Further, half of satisfied visitors who were in the proportion of 10%, had no response.
Moving further, after the innovation of museum, the number of visitors rose which was recorded 92000 as well as the percentage of satisfied and very satisfied masses increased which was approximately similar, while nearly half of them recorded as dissatisfied visitors followed by very satisfied persons (only 5%). However, after renewal of museum the proportion of those masses who did not have any response stayed identical as compared to before refurbishment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this proportion decreased, as a result, the number of tourists had increased aro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9497411324 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8516461405 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.5 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257276103642 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133932058177 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412421416308 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16464831469 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200242571024 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.