The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four different sports between 2001 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four
different sports between 2001 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant

The graph demonstrates the number of students of a particular UK school who participated in running, basketball, swimming and football over a ten-year period from 2001 to 2011.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that while the popularity of running grew over the period in question, and that of football remained high throughout, the number of students interested in basketball fell sharply. Swimming figures, meanwhile, saw an increase followed by a drop.

With regards to running and swimming, the starting figures were roughly identical at 18 and 20 participating students respectively. However, whereas the former climbed to reach 60 students in 2007 before leveling off for the remainder of the period, the latter peaked at 50 students in 2006 and then slipped to half this figure in 2011.

Turning to the ball sports, football stayed consistently popular, with student figures remaining between 60 and 70 throughout the period. Basketball’s popularity was nearly as high as football’s in the first half of the decade studied, with the number of participating students rising from 55 to 61, but 2006 to 2008 saw student numbers crash to 21, a figure which had not changed by 2011.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19487179487 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93041813183 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.721804038 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.714285714 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960585827212 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473999107456 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036208069377 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662453688875 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371543720052 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.