The presented table compares 3 nations in terms of car manufacture from 2003 to 2009.
Overall, while the number of cars produced in Thailand and Australia increased considerably, that for Argentina declined. Moreover, Thailand always ranked first among 3 countries in generating cars over the conveyed years.
Turning into detail, the figure of cars manufactured in Australia rose gradually, which was 200.000 in 2003 before expanding 3 times in 2009. In contrast, the number for Argentina was much higher, with twice as high as that for Australia in 2003. In the next 6 years, the car production of Argentina showed a downward trend, decreasing significantly to 161.000, which made Argentina become the country generating the least cars in 3 sectors.
Regarding to Thailand, the modifications were witnessed over the same period. From 2003 to 2005, the capability of Thailand soared to 1.119.000 from 700.000, which reached its peak. Throughout the remainders of the period, the figure for Thailand fell by 120.000.
- some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that professional athletes serve as positive role models for young people while others argue that their behavior both on and off the field can have a negative influence Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school is planned for the area. The map shows to possible sites for the school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89793989423 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7203999522 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158685154449 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692117098127 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517669296606 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109897439707 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566120252712 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.