The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods

The table illustrates the numbers of visitors at Ashdown Museum before and after its reconstruction, and pie charts demonstrate about the visitor's satisfaction with their visit to that museum in both periods.
Overall, not only numbers of visitors but their satisfaction rate also increased after its refurbishment in comparison to previous' museum.
From the first tabular form, it is evident that only 74000 commuters visited before its rebuilding, but increased by 18000 and reached to 92000 after improvement had been done.
Visitors, who visited Ashdown museum only 15% were very satisfied which drastically boosted and received second highest by acquiring 35% after improvement. 30% people were satisfied in past but by adding 10%, jumped to 40% after its rebuilding. In contrary, dissatisfaction rate dramatically plunged from 40% to 15% in new period. By the same token, number of visitors who were very dissatisfied reduced by halved of 10 % after renewed. In both period, 5% visitor didn't give any response about their satisfaction with regard to changes in museum.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...n, and pie charts demonstrate about the visitors satisfaction with their visit to that m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ter renewed. In both period, 5% visitor didnt give any response about their satisfact...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, with regard to, by the same token

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41071428571 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96537680789 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3400532172 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287929696457 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127403331509 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934157942345 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18449629128 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102451925734 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.